Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Follow us on
कांग्रेस ने दिल्ली की साउथ दिल्ली लोकसभा क्षेत्र से बॉक्सर विजेंदर सिंह को उम्मीदवार किया घोषित72 घंटे प्रचार नहीं कर पाएंगे नवोजत सिंह सिद्धू पूर्वी दिल्ली से बीजेपी के उम्मीदवार होंगे गौतम गंभीर बीजेपी ने पूर्वी दिल्ली से गौतम गंभीर-नई दिल्ली से मीनाक्षी लेखी को मैदान में उताराअम्बाला: विश्वकर्मा चैक के निकट लेनदेन के झगड़े में मारी गोलीअम्बाला से भाजपा प्रत्याशी कटारिया द्वारा दायर ताज़ा हलफनामे और पिछले 2014 एफिडेविट में दर्शाए अपने पैन कार्ड नंबर में अंतरकांग्रेस ने UP से 3 कैंडिडेट के नाम घोषित किएश्रीलंका में आतंकी हमले में लापता लोगों को लेकर देवगौड़ा ने सुषमा स्वराज से बात की

The Economic Times (Delhi)EDITORIAL-Sense and Non-Sense in Power Tariffs

April 09, 2016 06:05 AM

Apr 09 2016 : The Economic Times (Delhi)
Sense and Non-Sense in Power Tariffs

Force majeure is fine, but not over-invoicing
It seems one step forward and two steps back in the policy-challenged power sector. On the one hand, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Aptel) has upheld the principle of `force majeure' to allow review of tariffs from the Mundra plants of Tata Power and Adani Power that use coal imported from Indonesia. New imposts on coal by Indonesia that changed landed fuel prices at Mundra would have been beyond the control of the power producers, the Aptel ruling has rightly observed. On the other hand, the reported extensive over-invoicing of imported coal by several power producers, which is being investigated by the directorate of revenue intelligence (DRI), suggests massive corruption, misgovernance and the sheer lack of oversight. A systemic overhaul is required, with speed.
The Aptel judgment also reiterates the principle that power tariffs determined via competitive bidding, like those for the Adani and Tata plants, cannot be revised by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), the regulator, on the basis of changes in Indonesian law. Those regulatory changes can, however, invite the force majeure clause, the tribunal has ma intained. The idea that competitively determined tariffs are sacrosanct sa ve for force majeure developments or changes in Indian law is, indeed, welcome. We need a system where efficient power producers can drive down tariffs and, in the bargain, competitively seek custom. Concurrently , the political establishment needs to shun reckless unbudgeted giveaways in power, and clamp down on theft and huge revenue leakage in power distribution.

Meanwhile, the Economic and Political Weekly reports that coal priced $40-50 a tonne was imported at prices over $82 per tonne in 2014-15. The DRI needs to conclude investigations in a time-bound manner and follow through with charges. It points to systemic regulatory lacunas and the perverse policy rigidities in the domestic coal -we still don't allow private sector commercial mining of coal. Regulators cannot take claimed cost of fuel for granted and must verify them before fixing the tariff.


Have something to say? Post your comment