Saturday, May 30, 2020
Follow us on
National

How anti-Americanism blinds us Understand the chronology of Trump’s request for hydroxychloroquine, and India’s decision

April 08, 2020 05:59 AM

COURTESY HT APRIL 8

How anti-Americanism blinds us
Understand the chronology of Trump’s request for hydroxychloroquine, and India’s decision

Hydroxychloroquine and paracetamol are generic drugs. If Heads of State, such as the US President, are calling in for these, India should not squat on them AFP

You have to be quite reckless to be seen like defending both United States (US) President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Even if on the tiny issue of a two-rupee, or three cents a pill of a drug so old it was in the market for a full two years before I was born, and went off-patent when I was 32. Namely, hydroxycholoroquine (HCQ). And you must be absolutely nuts if at the same time you also take on anti-Americanism, the most durable of our ideological hypocrisies. Cast in titanium.

But after four decades in journalism and courting danger — and abuse — from all sides, let us do some plain-speaking.

To begin with, as the currently fashionable expression goes: Aap chronology samajhiye (Understand the timeline). It was in his daily White House press conference on March 19 that Trump first mentioned hydroxychloroquine, or HCQ as it’s popularly known. He said there had been encouraging results among coronavirus patients administered HCQ and Z-Pak (American brand name for antibiotic Azithromycin).

Trump can be accused of anything, but not understatement or discretion. So, he called this a game-changer. On March 21, he re-asserted this in a tweet. On March 22, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) issued a notification prescribing HCQ as a chemoprophylactic (preventive) for health personnel as well as family members looking after a Covid-19 patient. This set off a run on the drug.

While Trump was roundly attacked and ridiculed as usual in the American media for “misusing“ his office to plug prescription medications, the US placed large orders with leading generic manufacturers in India. This fact was scooped by ThePrint’s fine health and pharma reporter Himani Chandna in a story published on March 22. Three days later, India notified a ban on export of HCQ.

Alarmed at the prospect of hoarding and panicky self-medication, the Centre issued a notification on March 26 listing it in Schedule H1, thereby restricting its retail sale.

Remember, the ban had come after the US, and likely also Brazil, had already placed orders and also paid some advances to private Indian firms for what was, after all, a routine, long off-patent, cheap drug. Or drugs, as Brazil wanted paracetamol too.

After Democrats and the media had had fun with “Dr Trump”, on March 20, New York governor and current liberal darling, Andrew Cuomo, told anchor Sean Hannity that he’s getting 10,000 doses of HCQ and Azithromycin and releasing it for a trial on 1,100 patients in his state, now the global Covid-19 epicentre.

On Saturday (April 4) morning, Trump called Modi. In the evening, at his press conference, he said that he had requested Modi to release the supplies of HCQ “we had ordered”. He said Modi said he will consider it. He, of course, went on to say that they (India) make a lot of it, which is true. He further added that India also needs a lot of it (true), because it has 1.5 billion people (not true).

On Sunday (March 5) morning, Trump spoke with Modi again. In reply to a journalist’s question at his Monday evening (Washington time, remember, so around 4 am IST Tuesday) press briefing, he let it out that he had had another conversation with Modi on Sunday morning (Washington time) and that he was likely to release the HCQ, the US had ordered earlier. What if India says no, the reporter asked, will there be a retaliation? I don’t believe that is what they are planning to do at all, said Trump, India and the US are doing very well with each other. And then added, as an afterthought, if they say no, of course there may be retaliation, why wouldn’t that be?

We woke up to outrage on Tuesday morning. Trump twisted Modi’s arm and he gave in. India is down on its knees in front of the Americans again. Modi has sold Indian sovereignty and Covid-19 patients’ lives to Trump.

Now the little point I had deliberately excluded in my chronology, for suspense. Three respected media organisations, HT Group’s Mint, The Hindu, and (please allow me to add) ThePrint, had reported on Monday, April 6, 12 to 18 hours before Trump’s Monday evening presser, that India had already decided to lift the ban. In fact, The Hindu and Mint had recorded that Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro had called as well, and the ban was lifted for him too.

It was all done and dusted before Trump “threatened” this morning. Please do remember the time difference between Washington and New Delhi.

But facts are boring, you see. Why let facts come in the way of your “tubelight” outrage?

Paracetamol and HCQ are cheap, generic, mass-produced drugs long off-patent. India has the unique strength to make these for the world now. It should use it, not squat on it. The coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) has made these drugs, usually sold in bulk, like a commodity, valuable to the world. If Heads of State are calling in for these, it is an opportunity for India. And by the way, the raw material or Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) for paracetamol comes from China. From Wuhan, in fact.

And surrender to America? What did we call it through the 1960s, when we lived a ship-to-mouth existence? It was also our most anti-American decade. Today, the Americans need an ordinary drug, and we must deny it to them? The reason we call unthinking anti-Americanism our most durable, cast-in-titanium hypocrisy.

By special arrangement with ThePrint

The views expressed are personal

Have something to say? Post your comment