Thursday, August 22, 2019
Follow us on
BREAKING NEWS
हरियाणा ने सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के बैंकों की राज्य स्तरीय विचार मंथन दो दिवसीय बैठकपलक गौरी ने जीता नैशनल गोल्ड मेडल.जूनियर पेंचक सिलाॅट नैशनल चैंपियनशिप मेंRBI Increases operating hours of Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) System वर्तमान राज्य सरकार ने अपने पांच वर्ष के कार्यकाल में इन्द्री विधानसभा क्षेत्र में लगभग 1300 करोड़ रुपये के विकास कार्य करवाए:मनोहर लालहरियाणा पुलिस आगामी विधानसभा चुनाव के मद्देनजर अपराधियों पर कसेगी नकेलहरियाणा पुलिस के एएसआई ने विश्व पुलिस खेलों में जीता स्वर्ण पदक, डीजीपी ने दी बधाईमनोहर लाल ने प्रदेशवासियों को श्रीकृष्ण जन्माष्टमी के पावन पर्व की बधाई व शुभकामनाएं दीINX मामले में पी. चिदंबरम पर रोज एवेन्यू कोर्ट में सुनवाई शुरू
 
Niyalya se

Centre to apprise SC collegium on 4 lawyers

April 03, 2019 06:50 AM

COURTESY TOI APRIL 3

Centre to apprise SC collegium on 4 lawyers
Ajay.Sura@timesgroup.com

Chandigarh:

The Centre is believed to have decided to apprise the Supreme Court collegium of reasons why four lawyers of Punjab and Haryana high court cannot be considered for elevation as high court judges.


In January this year, the Punjab and Haryana high court collegium, comprising three senior-most judges — Chief Justice Krishna Murari, Justice A K Mittal and Justice Mahesh Grover — had recommended the names of eight lawyers for elevation as high court judges. These four lawyers are part of this group.

Significantly, these four lawyers against whom the Centre has expressed serious reservations are the same whose names were recommended earlier but had been sent back by the SC collegium. Their names were recommended for the second time this January.

‘Adverse remarks against two pertain to integrity’

Sources confirmed to TOI that after a meeting held last week, the Union government decided to communicate to the SC collegium in writing about the “remarks and background check reports” of these four lawyers received from the Intelligence Bureau.

The remarks, given by the central agency after thorough background check and comprehensive verification, against these four lawyers are reportedly adverse in nature.

The central government, according to sources, has also given adverse remarks against two of the remaining four lawyers on the issue of “integrity.”

In January, the high court collegium forwarded names of eight lawyers — Punit Bali, I P S Doabia, J S Puri, Kamal Sehgal, Vikas Bahl, Girish Agnihotri, Suvir Sehgal and Alka Sarin. The names of Girish Agnihotri, Kamal Sehgal, J S Puri and Suvir Sehgal were recommended for second time this January.

On recommendation by the high court collegium, the names are forwarded to the Supreme Court after clearance from the governors of Punjab and Haryana. Thereafter, the reports of Intelligence Bureau are considered for background check and to know the antecedents of the recommended candidates.

Finally, the reports are placed before the SC collegium, which makes recommendation to the Centre before the final orders are released by the President of India.

The Punjab and Haryana high court is facing huge shortage of judges, as there are only 52 judges at present against the sanctioned strength of 85

Have something to say? Post your comment