Thursday, July 19, 2018
Follow us on
BREAKING NEWS
राहुल गांधी कल अविश्‍वास प्रस्‍ताव के दौरान लोकसभा में देंगे स्‍पीच: आनंद शर्मा मिदनापुर: PM की रैली में घायल हुए लोगों से मिलने अस्‍पताल पहुंचीं ममता बनर्जी यूपी: देवरिया जेल पर डीएम ने मारा छापा, 1 मोबाइल, 4 पेन ड्राइव और चाकू बरामदसंसद भवन में 22 जुलाई को होगी कांग्रेस की कार्यसमिति की बैठक चार्जशीट फाइल करने के लिए सीबीआई पर दबाव डाला गया है: पी. चिदंबरम क्‍या औरतों को प्रार्थना करने का समान अधिकार नहीं: सबरीमाला पर जया बच्चन क्‍या औरतें पुरुषों से कमतर हैं: सबरीमाला पर जया बच्चनशहीद गुरसेवक के विद्यालय में मनाया गया वन महोत्सव, अध्यापकों व बच्चों ने लगाए 100 से अधिक पौधे
Niyalya se

Govt Leaves Status of Sec 377 on Apex Court

July 12, 2018 06:27 AM

courstey ET JULY 12
Urges court not to declare sexual orientation as part of a person’s fundamental right
Samanwaya.Rautray@timesgroup.com

New Delhi:

The Centre has refused to take a definitive position on constitutional validity of Section 377 of IPC, which criminalises homosexual activities, leaving it to the wisdom of Supreme Court judges.


ASG Tushar Mehta on Wednesday, however, warned SC against declaring that sexual orientation was a part of a person’s fundamental right, insisting that it would open the doors for incest, bestiality, sadomasochism and other such acts of sexual perversion.

Tushar Mehta reminded the court of provisions in the Hindu Marriage Act disallowing ‘sapinda’ marriages in this context. CJI Dipak Misra heading a fivejudge bench hearing a slew of petitions seeking to free the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) community from living under the shadow of Section 377 — was quick to contest his stand.

There was no question of allowing anything non-consensual or anything involving minors as they can’t give consent, the CJI said. “Where does incest come in? Consenting adults cannot be held criminally liable for any act,” he said.

“They (LGBTs) will be free to work, declare (their status)…but what other civil rights will follow will be part of a future lis (legal cause of action),” Misra said, adding issues such as adoption, maintenance, right to cohabit, and maintenance can be argued later.

Justice DY Chandrachud said the court was only concerned with a relationship between two consenting adults.

Have something to say? Post your comment
 
More Niyalya se News